The Ideas Letter
Some four decades ago, the historian Arno Mayer sparked a historiographical firestorm by arguing that the Nazi destruction of the European Jews was not the outcome of a long-settled master plan. Rather, Mayer wrote, it radicalized into a policy of continent-wide annihilation only at the end of 1941, when the Nazis’ campaign to destroy the Soviet Union failed to achieve the rapid victory they had expected. Jochen Hellbeck’s recent World Enemy No. 1 has traces of the Mayer volume but goes further and returns the Soviet Union to center stage in the chamber of horrors of World War II, after a decades-long interlude during which Poland had become the historiographical center of gravity. Through the novel deployment of personal diaries and other sources, Hellbeck shows that the Nazis imagined Soviet communism as a Jewish-led existential threat and that their 1941 invasion of the USSR became the laboratory in which Nazi mass murder radicalized. The great historian of genocide and memory culture A. Dirk Moses takes the full measure of Hellbeck’s essential tome.
Benjamin Moser’s new book on anti-Zionism has also attracted both foes and friends. Through a series of vignettes, Moser explains that Jewish opposition to Zionism is not a recent aberration or merely an expression of antisemitism, but a long-standing and often suppressed current within modern Jewish thought. Barnaby Raine, an editor at the revitalized socialist British publication Tribune, is an intellectual historian who has written and spoken considerably on theories of contemporary antisemitism. His judicious reading of Moser’s book will, one hopes, complicate the debate and move it past customary loggerheads.
In 2024 Jonathan S. Blake and Nils Gilman published the powerful (and powerfully speculative) book Children of a Modest Star,
Featured Essays
What is The Ideas Letter
Welcome to The Ideas Letter, a publication that prizes the unconventional. We are not in the business of persuading. We won’t try to convince you of anything—other than that the world is complex and reality ever-shifting. We are not here to advocate. What you will find, and we hope embrace, are contributions from across ideological aisles, from a broad range of disciplines and a true cross-section of thinking. If catholicity is your métier, and you are uneasy with banging the drum but would rather hear its many sounds, this is the place for you.
We really like critique. Not the mean-spirited or spiteful kind, but rather commentary that raises tough questions, unpacks assumptions, sometimes calls people on the carpet, and always provides opportunity for discussion. That is what we are really after—facilitating, augmenting, furthering, and bolstering debate around issues of consequence.
You’ll find here articles, essays, and criticism that will challenge you to think. Let us know your thoughts, and make sure to tell a friend. Or even someone with whom you disagree!
