The Ideas Letter

#61

It is a supreme honor to feature Martin Jay, a legendary figure in European intellectual history. Marty (as he is known by the legions who revere him) blazed trails in his early work reconstructing the history of the Frankfurt School, which shaped how intellectuals came to read critical theory. It also inspired a decades-long comradeship with the recently passed Jürgen Habermas. There has been a blizzard of obituaries of the great philosopher of the public square, but Jay here offers something different: colorful personal reminiscences that spotlight Habermas’s great talent not only for critique but for listening.

The historian Sarah Miller-Davenport takes up Zohran Mamdani’s promise to rebuild a social democratic New York by reverting to a worker-centered New Deal liberalism. She argues that the city’s fiscal crisis in the 1970s impelled grim, austere neo-liberalism but that Mamdani’s affinity to Fiorello La Guardia, NYC’s New Deal mayoral hero, suggests a humane alternative to market rule. Just short of 100 days into Mamdani’s stewardship, the jury’s out: Is this the road back to worker power?

The distinctive voice of Afra Wang has been in our pages before; here, she takes up the idea of “jailbreaking,” as both an actual act and a metaphor for how technological peripheries innovate by challenging, copying, and reassembling what the center produces. Wang’s piece made me recall the thesis of the historian James Billington, whose magisterial The Icon and the Axe considered the history of Russian culture through the frame of borrowing, adaptation, and then radical innovation. Perhaps peripheries have always been destined to do exactly that, whether in technology or in culture?

Leading off our curated section, Alani Golanski has long paired his legal practice with a passion for philosophy and literature.

Continue Reading → #61 Remembrances
#61

April 2, 2026

Remembrances

Featured Essays

What is The Ideas Letter

Welcome to The Ideas Letter, a publication that prizes the unconventional. We are not in the business of persuading. We won’t try to convince you of anything—other than that the world is complex and reality ever-shifting. We are not here to advocate. What you will find, and we hope embrace, are contributions from across ideological aisles, from a broad range of disciplines and a true cross-section of thinking. If catholicity is your métier, and you are uneasy with banging the drum but would rather hear its many sounds, this is the place for you.

We really like critique. Not the mean-spirited or spiteful kind, but rather commentary that raises tough questions, unpacks assumptions, sometimes calls people on the carpet, and always provides opportunity for discussion. That is what we are really after—facilitating, augmenting, furthering, and bolstering debate around issues of consequence.

You’ll find here articles, essays, and criticism that will challenge you to think. Let us know your thoughts, and make sure to tell a friend. Or even someone with whom you disagree!