The Ideas Letter
I once had the pleasure of visiting a rare Alvar Aalto structure in NYC, a closed-to-the-public conference room on the twelfth floor of the International Institute for Education across from the United Nations. It had all of Aalto’s hallmark qualities: a single, continuous aesthetic whole with warm, sculptural interiors and soft golden accents. As much as I admire the work of twentieth century form-givers like Aalto, I never did buy into the Modernist notion that great architecture and design can change social reality. Aalto features prominently in the curator and editor Daniele Belleri’s Ideas Letter essay, which returns to this hallmark Modernist conceit and animates it for the present global condition. Belleri argues that Finnish design—rooted in welfare-state modernism, ecological sensitivity, and a culture of preparedness—has long functioned as a political (even geopolitical) instrument and that today it offers Europe a model for resisting imperial pressures from the US, Russia, and digital platforms. Can Finland, a nation of fewer than six million people, deploy its singular aesthetic purpose in the service of a new European future?
Mahmood Mamdani, the esteemed historian and father of New York City’s headline-grabbing mayor, has rethought in his new intellectual memoir, Slow Poison: Idi Amin, Yoweri Museveni, and the making of the Ugandan State, the expulsion of South Asians (including his family) during the Idi Amin era in Uganda and the vast political consequences in the decades since. The Kampala-based intellectual Kalundi Serumaga takes the measure of Mamdani’s book to make sense of what was on few proverbial bingo cards: Mamdani’s partial rehabilitation of Amin’s sordid legacy as head of state in 1970s Uganda. Serumaga finds Mamdani’s retelling riven by contradiction but revealing, both of Uganda’s postcolonial struggles and of the limits of Africa’s progressive intelligentsia.
Featured Essays
What is The Ideas Letter
Welcome to The Ideas Letter, a publication that prizes the unconventional. We are not in the business of persuading. We won’t try to convince you of anything—other than that the world is complex and reality ever-shifting. We are not here to advocate. What you will find, and we hope embrace, are contributions from across ideological aisles, from a broad range of disciplines and a true cross-section of thinking. If catholicity is your métier, and you are uneasy with banging the drum but would rather hear its many sounds, this is the place for you.
We really like critique. Not the mean-spirited or spiteful kind, but rather commentary that raises tough questions, unpacks assumptions, sometimes calls people on the carpet, and always provides opportunity for discussion. That is what we are really after—facilitating, augmenting, furthering, and bolstering debate around issues of consequence.
You’ll find here articles, essays, and criticism that will challenge you to think. Let us know your thoughts, and make sure to tell a friend. Or even someone with whom you disagree!
