The Ideas Letter

#69

Peter Mair, the Irish political scientist who died in 2011, published a landmark essay and book on what he called “ruling the void.” He argued that Western democracy has been hollowed out in part because parties have withdrawn from their representative function and become more like governing elites rather than channels between citizens and the state. Mark Leonard, one of the keenest observers of European foreign policy, is a Mair devotee. I asked him to take the measure of Mair’s thesis for today’s political conjuncture, and he does so brilliantly. Leonard worries that Mair’s void will be filled by far-right ideology and mobilization. That may indeed be what the future portends.

Europe remains the focus, via Italy, of our next essay, written by the versatile writer and Italophile Ursula Lindsey (she spent much of her youth in Italy). Lindsey, who has written for The Ideas Letter on American decline as seen from the Middle East, now turns her attention to Melonismo, the political current around Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Meloni is a complicated and contradictory figure, who in some ways fulfills Mair’s description of managing the politics of a depoliticized society. Lindsey argues that Meloni’s durability rests on her personal narrative and her tactical flexibility: She is a moving target, which makes her hard to pin down ideologically, but for that very reason, she is all the more effective. Her critics warn of longer-term risks to democratic institutions and checks on power.

Finally, Owen Hatherley, who has lately turned his attention to the political culture and aesthetics of the built environment in Asia, tries to make sense of a puzzle: Why does Japanese modernism constantly reinvent itself? What are the implications of its culture of forced obsolescence,

Continue Reading → #69 Into the Voids
#69

July 23, 2026

Into the Voids

Featured Essays

What is The Ideas Letter

Welcome to The Ideas Letter, a publication that prizes the unconventional. We are not in the business of persuading. We won’t try to convince you of anything—other than that the world is complex and reality ever-shifting. We are not here to advocate. What you will find, and we hope embrace, are contributions from across ideological aisles, from a broad range of disciplines and a true cross-section of thinking. If catholicity is your métier, and you are uneasy with banging the drum but would rather hear its many sounds, this is the place for you.

We really like critique. Not the mean-spirited or spiteful kind, but rather commentary that raises tough questions, unpacks assumptions, sometimes calls people on the carpet, and always provides opportunity for discussion. That is what we are really after—facilitating, augmenting, furthering, and bolstering debate around issues of consequence.

You’ll find here articles, essays, and criticism that will challenge you to think. Let us know your thoughts, and make sure to tell a friend. Or even someone with whom you disagree!