The Ideas Letter
Dear Readers: We have a guest editor for Ideas Letter 66, my great colleague LuHan Gabel. LuHan has stewarded this very special issue on AI and technology from start to finish, and you shall see below the many fruits of her labor. – Leonard Benardo
As our culture pivots away from Enlightenment objectivity and rationality—think post-truth, the spread of conspiracy theories—and as the world becomes ever more chaotic, the thirst for sense-making is palpable. Our chatbots stand ready 24/7 to quench it. Flowing through these individual queries is a collective desire for a techno-future that is clean, smooth, relentlessly optimizing, and most importantly, abundant: one that promises to improve individual lives and ease social and political tensions. AI is the technology of our era, and Large Language Models (LLMs) in particular bring things into focus. Since we use language to connect with one another and to construct the world itself, any investigation into these models necessarily becomes an exploration of our own predicaments. In Issue 66, we lift the hood to peer into the inner working of the machine—and of our own: what we turn to the machine for, and whether we think it can deliver.
Sascha Altman DuBrul knows what it’s like to make meaning out of experiences that are deemed meaningless by others. A long-time organizer in the mad movement, and a therapist himself, DuBrul takes on an often-misunderstood phenomenon: AI psychosis. Mental health systems in the real world can be brutal and pathologizing. In contrast, interactions with the machine can seem frictionless. DuBrul asks whether this frictionless communication is truly helpful for people navigating alternate consciousness. If an LLM can bring one closer to self-knowledge, it must incorporate the insights of those who learned how to make sense of their extreme experiences.
Featured Essays
What is The Ideas Letter
Welcome to The Ideas Letter, a publication that prizes the unconventional. We are not in the business of persuading. We won’t try to convince you of anything—other than that the world is complex and reality ever-shifting. We are not here to advocate. What you will find, and we hope embrace, are contributions from across ideological aisles, from a broad range of disciplines and a true cross-section of thinking. If catholicity is your métier, and you are uneasy with banging the drum but would rather hear its many sounds, this is the place for you.
We really like critique. Not the mean-spirited or spiteful kind, but rather commentary that raises tough questions, unpacks assumptions, sometimes calls people on the carpet, and always provides opportunity for discussion. That is what we are really after—facilitating, augmenting, furthering, and bolstering debate around issues of consequence.
You’ll find here articles, essays, and criticism that will challenge you to think. Let us know your thoughts, and make sure to tell a friend. Or even someone with whom you disagree!
